| |
Siri Hayes’s large-format
photograph Lyric Theatre
at Merri Creek shows an immense canopy of trees
that dwarfs three tiny people standing on the banks
of a creek in inner city Melbourne. Apart from sublime
statements about Nature, the tangled branches metaphorically
speak of the mess that the land is in. The images in
Hayes’ series explore an ecosystem in a downward
spiral, where the effluvia of modern life – the
ubiquitous Coke cans, plastic bags and syringes –
choke up waterways and spoil the picture-postcard view.
Merri Creek is still a picturesque landscape under Hayes’
treatment, but an essentially troubled and deteriorated
one. Her images rely on the tension between soiled and
sublime views: think Claude Lorrain’s idyllic
vistas reconfigured for a post Exxon Valdez generation.
Hayes’ photographs of Merri
Creek represent the familiar sight of an Australian
terrain where homesick Anglo settlers have replanted
the area with English pastoral vegetation in an attempt
to declare a corner of Australia ‘Forever England’.
Decades on, the willows have gone feral, the water is
greasy with toxic bile spewed up by the factories upstream,
and the refuse of a thousand Safeway trips hangs from
the boughs. There is something Chernobyl-esque about
Lyric Theatre: small lonely figures trying to
build lives on the banks of a murky river. Everything
is derelict and, perhaps, everything is poisonous.
A referent for Hayes’ photographs
is the classical tradition of landscape painting –
such as Poussin – with its rules for framing the
landscape and ordering it according to golden mean ratios
and lofty ideals. Artists have sought to represent the
sublime for centuries. In seeking to contain the vastness
and magnitude of life, the symbols used to represent
the ‘sublime’ were appropriately grand:
the Power of Nature, the Solitude of the Mountains,
the Fury of the Sea, and so on. Hayes’s artwork
portrays a more down-home and dog-eared version of nature
with the oiliness of the river, the omnipresence of
plastic and the grime on the banks. Hayes recognises
our need for a rose-coloured view of the world, but
refuses the idealism of the sublime, and instead offers
a reality check. In Untitled,
the babbling brook is polluted, the frolicking faun
has been replaced by a harried downcast figure and the
Grecian ruins bathed in sunlight have become poo-brown
70s brick-veneer flats.
Lyric
Theatre is a contemporary extrapolation of Poussin’s
painterly exercise in melancholia Et
in Arcadia Ego, in which toga clad figures huddle
sadly around a country tomb. The title can be translated
to mean the regretful ‘And I too once lived in
Arcadia’ as well as the more haunting ‘And
I, Death, am also in Arcadia’. This cuts straight
to the heart of Lyric
Theatre, only Hayes has the contemporary overlay
of ecological devastation. For we too were granted Arcadia
but we botched it.
Hayes has sought out natural amphitheatres
at Merri Creek in which to stage her narratives and
has arranged her figures with overt theatricality. These
are not relaxed snapshots or images comprising ‘the
decisive moment’; these are rigidly arranged tableaux
in which the character’s poses are overstated.
The acting is meant to be wooden. Lyric Theatre is a
quasi-Greek tragedy in which the female figure plays
the role of a contemporary Cassandra, one suffering
under her ‘gift’ of prophesy. Holding her
wad of office paper and oriented towards us ready to
deliver her speech, this oracle’s announcement
might only be spooky in an ‘I see dead people,
they’re everywhere’ kind of way.
The scenes at Merri Creek borrow
from this Sixth Sense
cinematic genre of spooky-suburbia: images of city outskirts
that, post-David Lynch and The
X-Files, are easily loaded with eerie portent.
Landscapes where, if you look closely enough amongst
the tangled branches, you expect to see Laura Palmer,
wrapped in plastic. Lyric
Theatre also reminds
me of Douglas Coupland’s Girlfriend
in a Coma in which characters glibly trade stories
of childhoods imbued by dread of when the nuclear ‘Flash’
would happen. I can relate. It’s the fear that
the world is sliding into a toxic quagmire. Maybe the
river is clogged with belly-up poisoned fish; maybe
the air is carcinogenic; maybe some malevolent force
hangs, Blair Witch-style, in that net of trees. Something
is out there.
Phip Murray
This article was first published in edition three of
un Magazine.
Just as the dying days of
the campaign trail revealed the environment as a key
topic of differentiation between Australia's major political
parties, the environment has also been at the forefront
of Siri Hayes' mind. Her subject for this current exhibition,
Merri Creek, located not far from where she lives and
works, is a natural source of pleasure and beauty at
the edge of the city of Melbourne. The creek flows from
the foothills of the Great Dividing Range north of Wallan
on the Hume Highway. The upper and middle sections are
mostly rural, dotted with small townships as well as
the growing outer suburbs like Craigieburn. The lower
sections wind their way through Melbourne's northern
light industrial suburbs, between the Yarra and Maribyrnong
rivers.
Hayes’ large, colour
landscape photographs of this site share an impulse
with two of the best known contemporary photographers
working in the genre, Jeff Wall and Jem Southam. Thinking
about their approach to photographing the world
around them creates a context for Hayes’ similar,
though layered concerns. These artists use their
surrounding natural environment as the backdrop for
dramas of modern life (Wall) or as the catalyst for
a catalogue of the effects of time, climate and people
on the land (Southam), key interests for Hayes. Southam
explores sites around Britain and plays with the
idea of the ‘spell’ cast by the act of acute
observation with a camera on the land, while the carefully
scouted-out sites around Vancouver for Wall’s
‘near-documentary’ photographs leverage
off the conventions of cinema for emotional depth, lighting
and characterisation. Here, photography's transformation
of nature makes it spectre of and spectator
to human activity.
Hayes’ photographs sit
somewhere in the middle of these two modes of working,
as two broadly outlined approaches to photographing
the outdoors. The camera is used both as a
device to document the world and one that is able to
capture events or situations that are simply photo-fictions. In
Hayes' images, soft peaks of white bubbling water form
in the creek, while alongside are willow and poplar-lined
banks. Sunlight breaks through a jungle of branches,
the grassy and leafy undergrowth beneath is fresh and
vital. Buildings peek through but are held back by the
thickness of the trees. At times, Hayes’ camera
flies above the scene or looks under shrubbery, while
traditional pictorial devices like bridges and empty
benches become invitations to move in past the edges
of the image.
Puncturing this best of all possible worlds are two
things. One is the sediment of civilisation which Hayes
deliberately emphasises: plastic bags, drink cans, polystyrene
cups, paint tins and household junk choke the waterway
and the surrounding vegetation. The creek is an unstable
site, not quite a wilderness but nevertheless a natural
space at the fringe of the city. According to Friends
Groups, the area has been in a state of deterioration
for more than 100 years. Local businesses and volunteers
are involved in trying to clean up the site and remove
most of the introduced English trees, like the willow,
that grow in an out-of-control state.
The second is Hayes’
inclusion of people in the naturally-formed amphitheatres
at the banks of Merri Creek. Most exhibit seemingly
casual, suspended gestures that look staged because
they have been caught on film. These tableaux of forced
stillness make the relationship between the figures
and the landscape abstract and intensifies the fictionalisation
and dramatisation in each scene. In Lyric Theatre at
Merri Creek, for example, a woman holding a manuscript
is caught as if ready to recite a speech or launch into
the next stage of an operatic drama. Other images seem
accidental, perhaps more natural, as if Hayes snapped
her camera while the scene was still under way.
Amphitheatres, whether natural
or built, are internal spaces in the external world.
Hayes makes them into private rooms without walls. It’s
unclear what the real relationships are between Hayes’
subjects or what their purpose for being there is, but
most seem comfortable there. The trees surround, lessening
the exposure to wind and rain and so fulfil some of
their potential as a primary housing material. In one
image, however, a man standing between stepping stones
in the creek, his duffle coat collar pulled up to his
neck against the elements, evokes nomadism or homelessness.
Hayes’ use of enclosed and protective spaces in
the environment remind us of the sometimes cruel differences
between private and public spaces and the related issues
of border crossing and the trauma of displacement.
Our cultural and social connection
to landscape has been an ongoing concern in Hayes’
work. As with the plastic bags and tin cans in Merri
Creek, the presence of people on this setting is also
felt via signs such as a crooked path: a semi-permanent
human carving into the environment. Processes of destruction
and construction are co-dependent and necessary for
a future world, however, as we see in Hayes’ work,
sometimes the equilibrium is out of kilter. The problem
of rubbish in utopia is an eternal one: who gets rid
of it, where to store it, how to get everyone to do
the ‘right thing’. The solution is a balancing
act so as to find a way for these things to co-exist,
but in a way that we can still define them. Although
a truism, there is no production without waste and no
beauty without ugliness.Kate Rhodes, 2004.
Kate Rhodes is Assistant Curator
of Photography at the National Gallery of Victoria.
|
|